Cases 61 - 70 of 160
Reece v. Carey
as 3:2016cv00069
Defendant:
Shelby County, Kentucky, Shelby County, Kentucky doing business as Shelby County Detention Center, Bobby Waits and others
Plaintiff:
Reece and Joshua Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridner v. USA
as 6:2016cv00140
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Scotty Reece Ridner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. Clement et al
as 3:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Tommy Earl Jones
Defendant:
Bernard Clement, Amy Bowen, Georgia Crowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Miles
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Randy White , Steve Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. USA
as 2:2016cv00124
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Lester Reece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reece et al v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2016cv11653
Plaintiff:
MaryAnn Reece and Robert Reece
Defendant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bd Of Trustees Plumbing, et al v. Susan Humbert, et al
as 16-3285
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS, PIPE FITTERS & MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE, LOCAL UNION NO. 392 PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS, PIPE FITTERS & MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE, LOCAL UNION NO. 392 SUB FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS, PIPE FITTERS & MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE, LOCAL UNION NO. 392 EDUCATION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant:
STEVEN L. HUMBERT, dba Genesis Mechanical Services and SUSAN L. HUMBERT, dba Genesis Mechanical Services
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVE REECE, dba Genesis Mechanical Services and GENESIS MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.
James Reece v. TN
as 16-5311
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES R. REECE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
In re: Scotty Ridner
as 16-5072
Movant:
In re: SCOTTY REECE RIDNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
