Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Joseph v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 3:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
Rufus Joseph
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terry v. Numark Industries et al
as 5:2011cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Terry
Defendant:
Numark Industries and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary Caudill, et al v. Sears Transition Pay Plan, et al
as 11-1602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY CAUDILL, SYLVESTOR J. DEROSA, STEVEN D. FORD, SR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SEARS TRANSITION PAY PLAN, SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, SEARS HOME IMPROVEMENT PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED and others
Walker et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
David Walker and Thomasina Walker
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. and Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Darling et al
as 5:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Wendy J Darling , Unknown Spouse of Wendy J. Darling, Discover Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Crawley McFadden v. Sears, Roebuck & Co, et al
as 11-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAWLEY MCFADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO
Defendant:
HOME OWNERS LIABILITY
Gary Caudill, et al v. Sears Transition Pay Plan, et al
as 10-2450
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY CAUDILL, SYLVESTOR J. DEROSA, STEVEN D. FORD, SR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SEARS TRANSITION PAY PLAN, SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, SEARS HOME IMPROVEMENT PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED and others
Bailes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 3:2010cv00450
Plaintiff:
Linda Bailes
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. K-Mart Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Greta G. Davis
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawther v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 2:2010cv13332
Plaintiff:
Linda Crawther
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
