Cases 71 - 80 of 2,216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coffman v. Roby
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University, et al
as 24-3042
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WARMAN
Defendant:
MOUNT ST. JOSEPH UNIVERSITY, MOUNT ST. JOSEPH POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN KOO and others
Parker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv10079
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Matthew Baranski, John Doe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Thomas et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Thomas and Tammy Tomaziefski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pamela Moses v. TN, et al
as 24-5086
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MOSES
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, AMY P. WEIRICH, in her individual capacity and STEVEN JOHN MULROY
Hightower v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Hightower
Respondent:
Commissioner Cookie Crews, Branch Manager Jennifer Travis, Warden Kevin Mazza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Larry Williamson v. Amy Robey
as 23-6109
Petitioner:
LARRY WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Warden, Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cope v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, Warden Amy Robey, Deputy Security Patricia Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
