Cases 71 - 80 of 157
Gresham #272603 v. Clute et al
as 1:2015cv01066
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Christian Clute, Steve Barber, Unknown Thurlby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Daphne M. Johnson, Willie O. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Sango v. Daphne Johnson, et al
as 15-2152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAPHNE M. JOHNSON, RICHARD RUSSELL, KENNETH MACEACHERN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Alexis M. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ward #240660 v. Campbell et al
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ward #240660
Defendant:
D. Campbell, V. Olmstead, Unknown Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Casey's General Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Johnson
Defendant:
Casey's General Stores, Inc. and Casey's Marketing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Johnson v. Synovus Bank et al
as 2:2014cv02950
Defendant:
Synovus Bank , Crimson Portfolio, LLC, Crimson Portfolio Alpha, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
B. Johnson and M. Johnson
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02672
Plaintiff:
Annette M Johnson
Defendant:
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo US Holdings, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Sango v. Daphne Johnson, et al
as 14-2474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAPHNE M. JOHNSON, RICHARD RUSSELL, KENNETH MACEACHERN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
