Cases 71 - 80 of 330
Rosas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02598
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45163
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Mylan Institutional Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA TACHI YOKUT TRIBE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Acosta et al v. Lexington Golf & Travel, LLC
as 5:2020cv00160
Plaintiff:
Rhian Sugden, Katarina Van Derham, Rosa Acosta and others
Defendant:
Lexington Golf & Travel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cintron et al v. Newman et al
as 2:2020cv10354
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, The City of Flint, a municipal corporation, Michael Glasgow and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Durrett, Jr., Sandra D Crichton, J. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa Smith v. Washtenaw Intermediate Sch Dis, et al
as 20-1087
Defendant:
JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA WITHAM, LISA CORRELL, ANNE NAKON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSA SMITH, by and through her guardian, Doreen Smith
Flores et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosa A. Flores and Ruben Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosa v. May et al
as 1:2019cv02992
Defendant:
C.O. Battle, Inspector Kelly Rose, Warden May and others
Plaintiff:
Edito Rosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikhail v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05309
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosa Mikhail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheers v. Rosa et al
as 1:2019cv00913
Defendant:
James L. Rosa, A&K Trucking,LLC, J&K Trucking, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lillian Cheers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
