Cases 81 - 90 of 681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mayo v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Mayo
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Daniel Long, Wellpath Corporate Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. ShieldMark, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00748
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Lowe and InSite Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
ShieldMark, Inc., Advanced Plastics, Inc. and Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Darryl Smith v. Clifford Pinkney, et al
as 21-3486
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC IVEY, Warden of Cuyahoga County Jail; individual and official capacity, DETECTIVE DIVITA, individual and official capacity, CLIFFORD PINKNEY, Cuyahoga County Sheriff; individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL SMITH, aka Darnell Smith
Sadler v. Wellpath et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Pratul Patel, Angela Clifford, Ashley Vanmeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford TaylorIn re: Clifford Taylor
as 21-3585
Petitioner:
In re: CLIFFORD D. TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN NEIL TURNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cleveland v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv02305
Defendant:
Charles Retina Center, Floyd Bonner, Lee Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cobbeldick et al v. Cuyahoga County Corrections Center et al
as 1:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Frank Golphin, Lawrence Jackson, Charles Jackson and others
Defendant:
Eric Ivey, Sheriff Clifford Pinkney, Cuyahoga County Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
