Cases 81 - 90 of 157
Fox v. Eddy et al
as 2:2012cv00324
Plaintiff:
David G Fox
Defendant:
Eddy, Gary Krisher, Lisa Bethel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
White v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv01086
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Edward White
Defendant:
Roy Morgan , Donald H. Allen , David G. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hacker v. Lincoln County Kentucky et al
as 5:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
David Hacker
Defendant:
Lincoln County Kentucky , William D. Gooch , Rodney Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Stockton et al
as 3:2011mc00026
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Jack Stockton, Tim Phillips, Vicki Owen and others
Terrell v. Mills
as 3:2011cv01108
Petitioner:
Javonte Demontez Terrell
Respondent:
David G. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David G. Alseth v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22437
Plaintiff:
David G. Alseth
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Peart v. Seneca County, et al
as 11-4070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY PEART
Defendant - Appellant:
SENECA COUNTY, THOMAS STEYER, Sheriff, Seneca County, BENJAMIN E. NUTTER, Seneca County Commissioner and others
Clifford Houston v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 11-6093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ROBERT E. COOPER, Individually and Officially as Attorney General & Reporter, RANDY E. NICHOLS, Individually and Officially as 6th Judicial District Attorney General and others
James Love, III v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 11-2113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOVE, III
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN, STATE OF, OAKLAND, COUNTY OF, FRED M. MESTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
