Cases 81 - 90 of 809
USA v. Don Ellis
as 23-3147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DON WOODSON ELLIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ellis v. Dearborn, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10233
Plaintiff:
Tyken Cardalle Ellis
Defendant:
City of Dearborn, Joshua Urbiel, Matthew York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ellis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Talley-Ellis v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv12841
Petitioner:
Wilshawn Talley-Ellis
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Minniefield et al v. Woodard - CM, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv02112
Plaintiff:
Wendy Minniefield and Ellis Jackson
Defendant:
Woodard - CM, LLC, Litex Industries, Limited and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joseph Fischer, et al v. Karen Thomas, et al
as 22-5938
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH FISCHER, FISCHER FOR SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE and ROBERT A. WINTER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE KAREN A. THOMAS, as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission, HONORABLE R. MICHAEL SULLIVAN, as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission, HONORABLE EDDY COLEMAN, as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
