Cases 81 - 90 of 3,256
Tassone v. D'Varga et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tassone
Defendant:
Judge Jessica G D'Varga and Judge James Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02089
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Green
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Angelo, et al v. State Farm Mutl Automobile Ins Co, et al
as 24-1379
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., STATE OF MICHIGAN, ex rel., STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. and others
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, AUTO CLUB ENTERPRISES INSURANCE GROUP, AUTO CLUB COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Short v. MSHDA et al
as 2:2024cv11127
Plaintiff:
QaShontae Hosomla Short
Defendant:
MSHDA, Becka Management, Michigan Rehabilitation Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. Green
as 0:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Tarell Thomas
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Fishback v. Warren County, KY Fiscal Court, et al
as 24-5379
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FISHBACK
Defendant:
WARREN COUNTY, KY FISCAL COURT, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF BOWLING GREEN, KY, ROBERT STIVERS, Kentucky State Senator and others
Anderson v. Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Lonnita Anderson
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment
Green et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Lillian Green and Aree Green
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
