Cases 81 - 90 of 138
McQueen et al v. City Manager, City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Lisa McQueen , Shirlene Britton , Pete Witte and others
Defendant:
City Manager, City of Cincinnati, Ohio and Cincinnati, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. McQueen
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John McQueen v. Nancy Berryhill
as 13-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. MCQUEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY BERRYHILL
McQueen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Debbie McQueen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
McQueen v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Barbara McQueen
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunham v. Malik et al
as 2:2013cv10001
Plaintiff:
Russell Dunham
Defendant:
Malik, Burkirk, Jeffrey C. Stieve and others
John McQueen v. T. Pyles, et al
as 12-4485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. MCQUEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
T. PYLES and R. WAUGH
McQueen v. Berryhill
as 2:2012cv01124
Plaintiff:
John W. McQueen
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Baker v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2012cv15290
Defendant:
Vernon Roy Stevenson, Prison Health Services, Inc, Corizon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA et al v. Carpenter et al
as 6:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Sharon Sue Carpenter, Unknown Spouse of Sharon Sue Carpenter , Unknown Heirs of Sharon Sue Carpenter and others
Trustee:
Deborah McQueen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
