Cases 1 - 10 of 250
USA v. Gill
as 2:2024mc50465
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jagrant Singh Gill
Petitioner:
Ms. Kirandeep Gill
Gill v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65422
Plaintiff:
Symboii Gill
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Covington v. Gill Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Emily Covington
Defendant:
Gill Transportation, LLC and Stephen Wright Gill
Interested Party:
Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
C.A.T. Global, Inc. v. Gill X Transport Group
as 2:2024cv10319
Plaintiff:
C.A.T. Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Gill X Transport Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Bannister v. Naveed
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
Waylon Bannister
Defendant:
Gill Naveed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vaughan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv02671
Plaintiff:
Beau Cameron Vaughan
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, Mr. Byrd, Mr. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Webb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv02038
Plaintiff:
Gill Webb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Lancaster Bingo Company LLC v. Gill et al
as 2:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Lancaster Bingo Company LLC
Defendant:
Mark Gill and Grover Gaming, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
