Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lori Laskaris, et al v. Fifth Third Bank
as 18-3390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANET FYOCK, DANIEL LASKARIS, WILLIAM R. KLOPFENSTEIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FIFTH THIRD BANK
Amicus Curiae:
CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA and CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FIFTH THIRD EARLY ACCESS CASH ADVANCE LITIGATION
Little v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (JRG2)
as 2:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ryan D. Little
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Little et al v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02758
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Little and Kathleen D. Little
Defendant:
Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Little v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2016cv02289
Plaintiff:
Carol D. Little
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Little v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv01047
Plaintiff:
John D. Little
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Klopfenstein et al v. Fifth Third Bank
as 1:2012cv00851
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Adanich, Lyn A. Adanich, Janet Fyock and others
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Little v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2010cv00468
Petitioner:
Schawn D Little
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Johnny Robinson
as 08-3378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNNY ROBINSON, aka D Little
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
