Cases 1 - 10 of 288
Morales v. Catholic Diocese of Cleveland et al.
as 1:2024cv01512
Defendant:
Catholic Diocese of Cleveland, John Doe, Saint Edward High School and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kitchen et al v. Jefferson Schools et al
as 5:2024cv11810
Plaintiff:
Kristina J. Kitchen and Tammy S. Morales
Defendant:
Deann Wuelfing, Nelson Henry and Jefferson Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carl Puckett, Jr., et al v. Ain Jeem, Inc., et al
as 24-5537
Defendant:
JOYCELYN BROWN, Attorney, ALEJANDRO FERNANDEZ, Attorney, ANDREW DAVID LOCKTON, Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR. and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Carl Puckett, et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 24-5282
Plaintiff:
CARL PUCKETT, MARCELLA PUCKETT and CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR.
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Irineo Herrera-Morales v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3391
Petitioner:
IRINEO HERRERA-MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Morales Saucedo v. Yolanda & Margarito, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
LUIS MORALES SAUCEDO
Defendant:
YOLANDA & MARGARITO, LLC, MARGARITO ROJAS, YOLANDA ROJAS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
