Cases 1 - 10 of 196
W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd, et al v. Isabella Guzman, et al
as 24-3483
Plaintiff:
W6 RESTAURANT GROUP, LTD, dba Barley House, 1909 W25, LLC, dba TownHall Cleveland, 2125 CAFE, LLC, dba Green Goat Cafe Bar and others
Defendant:
ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Small Business Administration, JOHN A. MILLER, in his official capacity as Deputy Associate Administrator for Capital Access of the Small Business Administration and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Jesse Guzman v. USAA Federal Savings Bank, et al
as 24-3425
Plaintiff:
JESSE GUZMAN
Defendant:
USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, dba Mr. Cooper
Guzman v. USA
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Marco Guzman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guzman v. Tommy Carwash Systems Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Camden Guzman
Defendant:
Tommy Carwash Systems Inc. and Matt Nagelkirk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Guzman v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65116
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guzman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Roman Guzman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Erlinda Ortiz-Funes, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3196
Petitioner:
ERLINDA ORTIZ-FUNES and CARLOS JAVIER GUZMAN-ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Adams et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
James Adams and Nancy Guzman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
