Cases 1 - 10 of 695
Parsons v. Graham Lumber Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Chris Parsons
Defendant:
Graham Lumber Company, LLC and American Hardwood Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Elizabeth Nelson, et al v. Service Towing, Inc., et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NELSON and ALBERT D. THROWER
Defendant:
SERVICE TOWING, INC., ABLE TOWING, LLC, EDWARD D. HERTZ, President and others
Graham v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65281
Plaintiff:
Archristopher Graham
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunn v. Pietraszkiewicz et al.
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Defendant:
Officer Ann Pietraszkiewicz, Detective Gregory Williams, Officer John Marincek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Graham III v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Frank Graham III
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Edmund Graham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01556
Plaintiff:
Prince Graham
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
