Cases 1 - 10 of 160
USA v. Jaime Ruiz-Montes
as 24-3499
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAIME RUIZ-MONTES
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monte v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02775
Plaintiff:
Steven Christopher Monte, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas #684159 v. Jurva et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Romero Monte Thomas #684159
Defendant:
Leland Jurva, Mark Skytta, Nicholas Lanctot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65297
Plaintiff:
Monte Morgan
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Monte et al
as 2:2024cv10950
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander Smith
Defendant:
Monte, Perkins, John Doe and others
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. B 1st Logistics LLC et al.
as 3:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
B 1st Logistics LLC and Monte D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Romero Thomas v. M. Haske, et al
as 23-1852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. HASKE, Teacher, sued in his personal capacity and S. JOHNSON, Sergeant, sued in his personal capacity
Thomas #684159 v. Haske et al
as 1:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Romero Monte Thomas #684159
Defendant:
M. Haske and S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
