Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Aubrey v. Radial, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff: Jerad Aubrey
Defendant: Radial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: Gavin Perkins
Defendant: Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65035
Plaintiff: Aubrey Baker
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10390
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kimberly Potter v. Debra Wehrle, et al
as 24-3097
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY POTTER
Defendant: DEBRA GORRELL WEHRLE, AUBREY COOK and OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff: Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant: Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner: Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Aubrey Stanley, Jr. v. Bryan Morrison
as 23-1742
Petitioner / Appellant: AUBREY JILES STANLEY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Wilcox v. State of Ohio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff: Robert S. Wilcox
Defendant: State of Ohio, Lancaster Correctional Institution, C.O. Whitey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aubrey EisomIn re: Aubrey Eisom
as 23-5665
Petitioner: In re: AUBREY TREMAYNE EISOM
Respondent: JOHNNY FITZ, Warden
Aubrey Murray v. City of Elizabethton, TN, et al
as 23-5323
Plaintiff / Appellee: AUBREY S. MURRAY
Defendant: CITY OF ELIZABETHTON, TN and BARRY CARRIER
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL ESTES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?