Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Barfield v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Maurice Barfield
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barfield v. Deputy Warden Special Services et al
as 3:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
Zachary Barfield
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Special Services, Mailroom Supervisor, Chaplain Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zachary Barfield v. Douglas Fender, et al
as 21-3409
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, DOUGLAS FENDER, Warden and MATT GILLUM, STG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY BARFIELD
Barfield v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01813
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Barfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milhouse et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2020cv10449
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Daugherty Johnson, Governor Richard D. Snyder and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Stacker, R. D., Russell Lavern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2020cv10369
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Glasgow, Leo A. Daly Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Barron, Lattice Price, L. N. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Barfield v. Fender et al
as 4:2019cv02306
Plaintiff:
Zachary Barfield
Defendant:
Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Fender and STG Matt Gillum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahearn et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11337
Plaintiff:
Tim Auer, Alice Hughes, Val Grimes and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch LLC and Robert Bosch GmbH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Barfield v. Storzan et al
as 3:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sharron Barfield
Defendant:
John Storzan, Mark Bolton and Unknown Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
