Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hale et al v. Clinton, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fisher, Dana Hale and William Pruesner
Defendant:
Clinton County, Chad Bashore, Jeffrey Armbrustmacher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myerscough v. United Methodist Church, The et al
as 2:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
John J. Myerscough
Defendant:
United Methodist Church, The, Pickford United States Methodist Church, Carol Sue McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Myerscough v. United Methodist Church, The et al
as 1:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
John J. Myerscough
Defendant:
United Methodist Church, The, Pickford United States Methodist Church, Carol Sue McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hehrer v. Clinton, County of et al
as 1:2020cv01079
Defendant:
Sergeant Chad Bashore, James Burdick, Dawn Thelen, L.P.N. and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Hehrer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson #630619 v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2020cv00041
Defendant:
S. Burke, Unknown Yore, Unknown Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Luster Ray Nelson #630619, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRECTV, LLC v. Bashore et al
as 3:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Tracy R Bashore, Marjorie E North , Mary E North and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Paul Davis v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 12-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, PATRICIA CARUSO, NICK LUDWICK and others
Davis v. St. Louis, City of et al
as 2:2012cv10528
Plaintiff:
Paul Davis
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, Patricia Caruso, Nick Ludwick and others
Bashore v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
as 2:2010cv14774
Defendant:
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Bashore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
