Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hofer v. Spencer et al
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Hofer
Defendant:
Brett M. Spencer, C. David Kelly, Kristopher Blanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrow Electronics, Inc. et al v. Attevo, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Arrow Electronics, Inc. and Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Attevo, Inc. and C. David Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
East v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20598
Plaintiff:
Linda J. East and C. David East
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt et al v. Lower Harbor Properties, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
C. David Hunt and Carol Santangelo
Defendant:
Lower Harbor Properties, LLC , Swailes Plumbing & Heating, Inc. and Dressler Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MacDonald v. Agacinski et al
as 2:2010cv11646
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. MacDonald
Defendant:
Robert L. Agacinski, Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, Attorney Discipline Board and others
Hunt et al v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2009cv00038
Plaintiff:
C. David Hunt and Carol Santangelo
Defendant:
Robert Armstrong, Amy Armstrong and Harbor Ridge Townhouse Condominium Association
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Snyder v. All-Pak, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03566
Plaintiff:
C. David Snyder
Defendant:
All-Pak, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Crawford et al
as 3:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust and Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
Defendant:
Edwin M. Crawford, Edwin M. Crawford, Edwin M. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
