Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Buchanan v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02758
Plaintiff:
Conelius Buchanan
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, J. Baidoo and C. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr. et al v. Praxair, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00277
Plaintiff:
Freddie Jones, Jr. and Donnell C. Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc. and Anthony W. Crossley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02195
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lavell Matthews
Defendant:
City of Memphis, C. Holmes and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Holmes v. Russell Barker, et al
as 10-5570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH C. HOLMES, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL BARKER, a police officer for the City of Clinton, Tennessee, VAUGHN BECKER, a police officer for the City of Clinton, Tennessee, DON LAYTON, Judge for the Sessions Court in Anderson County, Tennessee and others
Joseph Holmes v. Russell Barker, et al
as 09-5768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH C. HOLMES, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL BARKER, a police officer for the City of Clinton, Tennessee, VAUGHN BECKER, a police officer for the City of Clinton, Tennessee, DON LAYTON, Judge for the Sessions Court in Anderson County, Tennessee and others
Holmes v. Barker et al
as 3:2008cv00495
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Holmes
Defendant:
Russell Barker, Vaughn Becker, Don Layton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2007cv00420
Plaintiff:
David C. Holmes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
