Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Rocket Mortgage, LLC v. J. Patterson Mortgage Lending, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10574
Plaintiff: Rocket Mortgage, LLC, Quicken Loans, LLC and Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant: J. Patterson Mortgage Lending, LLC and James C. Patterson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Patterson v. Eppinger We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00777
Respondent: Warden LaShann Eppinger
Petitioner: Brandon C. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00392
Plaintiff: Steven C. Patterson
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
James Patterson v. Michael Seiber, et al
as 09-6152
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: JAMES C. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: MICHAEL SEIBER, In his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Mayor of The City of Earlington, Kentucky and CITY OF EARLINGTON, KENTUCKY
James Patterson v. Michael Seiber, et al
as 09-6153
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: JAMES C. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: MICHAEL SEIBER, In his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Mayor of The City of Earlington, Kentucky and CITY OF EARLINGTON, KENTUCKY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02822
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Patterson v. Seiber, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv00052
Plaintiff: James C. Patterson, James C. Patterson and James C. Patterson
Defendant: Michael Seiber, Michael Seiber, City of Earlington, Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Bradford Soap Works Inc
as 3:2005cv00081
Plaintiff: John C Patterson
Defendant: Bradford Soap Works Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?