Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Lee v. Cassano's Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Zachery Lee
Defendant:
Cassano's Inc. and Christopher Cassano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larson v. Cassano's Inc.
as 3:2018cv00005
Defendant:
Cassano's Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Larson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Larson v. Cassano's Inc.
as 3:2018oe00005
Defendant:
Cassano's Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Larson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Larson v. Cassano's Inc.
as 3:2018cv00004
Defendant:
Cassano's Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Larson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Adam Cassano v. Terry A. Tibbals
as 1:2014cv02215
Petitioner:
Adam Cassano
Respondent:
Terry A. Tibbals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassano v. Bradshaw
as 1:2003cv01206
Petitioner:
August Cassano
Respondent:
Margaret Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
