Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Bernard Branch v. M. Malone, et al
as 23-2001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BERNARD BRANCH
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN M. MALONE, Warden, RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER R. LOVE, R. THIBAULT, Deputy Warden at Muskegon and others
Cady v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv11081
Plaintiff:
Irvin Cady
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Freight, LLC v. Cady et al
as 2:2021cv02136
Defendant:
Haris Buljina and Joel Cady
Plaintiff:
American Freight, LLC and American Freight Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Darryl Robinson v. Governor of Michigan, et al
as 19-1810
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES BUSH, Captain, TONY BAYNES, JOHN OCWIEJA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL A. ROBINSON
Hamby v. McCallister et al
as 3:2018cv00865
Defendant:
Tony Parker, f/n/u Phillips and Cadie McCallister
Plaintiff:
William Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primus v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron) et al
as 5:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Sharyll Primus
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron), Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 5:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Paul Cunningham
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross Maclin v. Kelly Holden, et al
as 17-1254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSS ANTHONY MACLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY HOLDEN and RICHARD CADY
IBJ Book Publishing, LLC et al v. Shunnarah et al
as 3:2016cv00664
Plaintiff:
IBJ Book Publishing, LLC and Richard (Dick) E. Cady
Defendant:
Nader G. Shunnarah and John Andrew White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
