Cases 1 - 10 of 632
Casey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02727
Plaintiff:
John Casey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Casey v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65624
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Casey
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosemond v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Brenda A. Rosemond
Defendant:
James Casey and HUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Ashbrook v Meigs County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hannah Ashbrook
Defendant:
Meigs County, TN, State of Tennessee, Attorney Casey Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Casey et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Richard Casey and Candice Casey
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright et al v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright, Casey Wright and Josh Wright
Defendant:
Thomas Vilsack, Michael Watson, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wright et al v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Josh Wright, Casey Wright and Michael Wright
Defendant:
Thomas Vilsack, Michael Watson, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jeffery Johnson v. Casey Kimbro, et al
as 24-5203
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CASEY KIMBRO, PREA CORD, OFFICER PISZNER, PREA CORD, CAPTAIN MIKE HOPKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
