Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Roulo v. Fidelity Management Trust Company
as 4:2021cv12944
Plaintiff:
Coleen Roulo
Defendant:
Fidelity Management Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Alford v. William Terrell, et al
as 20-4220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR COLEEN SEBULA, DOCTOR DIMOSTHENIS MANOTOPOULOS, DOCTOR MARK HILL and others
Alford v. Terrell et al
as 2:2020cv02297
Defendant:
Dr. William D Terrell, Dr. Dimosthenis Manotopoulos, Dr. Allison M. Hinko and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02602
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Coleen Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02102
Defendant:
Inc. Davol, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Love and Coleen N. Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ganobcik, et al.
as 1:2019cv02797
Defendant:
Coleen Ganobcik, Signet Jewelers Limited and Sterling Jewelers Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harnden v. St. Clair, County of et al
as 5:2016cv13904
Plaintiff:
Pamela Suzanne Harnden
Defendant:
St. Clair, County of , Michigan Sheriff Department , Tim Donnellon and others
Charles Steele, et al v. Charlotte Jenkins, et al
as 16-4205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES M. STEELE and JEROME ROYSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE JENKINS, [UNKNOWN] PARKS, Sherman School Principal, CATHY PUMMILL and others
Steele et al v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Steele and Jerome Royster
Defendant:
Charlotte Jenkins, Parks, Cathy Pummill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv01363
Plaintiff:
Mary Coleen Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
