Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Potrykus v. McLaren Health Care et al
as 1:2023cv10813
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Potrykus
Defendant:
McLaren Health Care, McLaren Bay Region, McLaren Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Adam et al v. Nakhle et al
as 1:2022cv02183
Plaintiff:
Adam Beres LLC, Dror Adam, Adam Beres One LLC and others
Defendant:
George Nakhle, Samir Nakhle, Richard Russell Gutzky and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dains et al v. Essity North America Inc.
as 2:2022cv12386
Plaintiff:
Sheri Dains, Monica Dowd, Angela Freier and others
Defendant:
Essity North America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jensen, et al. v. Ark-Dowd Dough, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01087
Defendant:
Ark-Dowd Dough, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Humphrey and Nicole Jensen
Counter Defendant:
Nicole Jansen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Theresa Dowd v. USA
as 20-1549
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERESA DOWD
Dowd v. United States
as 1:2019cv13611
Plaintiff:
Theresa Dowd
Defendant:
Paul Borninski and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Does v. Deborah Haaland, et al
as 19-6347
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH HAALAND and ELIZABETH WARREN
Defendant:
ANA VIOLETA NAVARRO FLORES, JEFFREY SHAUN KING, KATHY GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOES, 1 through 10
Does 1 through 10 v. Haaland et al
as 2:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Maggie Haberman, Ana Violeta Navarro Flores, Adam Edelen and others
Plaintiff:
John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dowd v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02585
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Dowd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Edwards et al.
as 1:2017cv02064
Plaintiff:
Eddie Taylor
Defendant:
William J. Edwards, David A. Sierleja and David D. Dowd, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
