Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Potrykus v. McLaren Health Care et al
as 1:2023cv10813
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Potrykus
Defendant:
McLaren Health Care, McLaren Bay Region, McLaren Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Bieri #288329 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Defendant:
Unknown Dewald, W. Anderson, R. Rewerts and others
Plaintiff:
Jack C. Bieri #288329
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Rohrs, Dona Powell, United Telephone Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Commissioner:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Howard et al v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
Daylon Howard and Tracy Dewald
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Inc. , Charter Communications, LLC and TWC Administration LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dewald v. Christiana Trust
as 2:2014cv13680
Plaintiff:
David W. Dewald
Defendant:
Christiana Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Winkle v. Colleen Ruggieri, et al
as 14-3362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK R WINKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
COLLEEN RUGGIERI, LINDA RICE, MARSHA DUTTON and others
Mark Winkle v. Edmund Sargus, Jr., et al
as 14-3340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK R WINKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS, ZACHERY P. KELLER and others
Mark Winkle v. Colleen Ruggieri, et al
as 14-3141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK R WINKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
COLLEEN RUGGIERI, LINDA RICE, MARSHA DUTTON and others
Winkle v. Sargus et al
as 2:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark R Winkle
Defendant:
Edmund A Sargus, Elizabeth P. Deavers, Zachary Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Brown v. University Of Kentucky, et al
as 13-5731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT & TRAINING SERVICES, VINCENT GEREMIA, ANGELA ESTEP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
