Cases 1 - 10 of 558
McGore v. Nessel et al
as 2:2024cv11509
Petitioner:
Darryl McGore
Respondent:
Dana Nessel, US Supreme Court Justices and US District Court Judges
Sheppard v. Sage Cove, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv11418
Plaintiff:
Allen Fitzgerald Sheppard, Jr.
Defendant:
Sage Cove, LLC., Tapper and Fratto, LLC., District Court of Maryland and others
Lesley Vowels v. KY, et al
as 24-5508
Plaintiff:
LESLEY VOWELS
Defendant:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, GENE SNYDER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY and others
Smith-El v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv11370
Plaintiff:
Sheik D. Smith-El
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dana Nessel, Detroit Land Bank Authority and others
Lesley Vowels v. State of Kentucky, et al
as 24-5495
Plaintiff:
LESLEY VOWELS
Defendant:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, GENE SNYDER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY and others
Williams v. Campbell County 17th District Court
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gerald Nugget Williams
Defendant:
Campbell County 17th District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rickey Benson v. Sheryl Lipman
as 24-5381
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
SHERYL H. LIPMAN, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
Bibb v. The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Bibb
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
