Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Wood-Hill v. Hinkle et al
as 3:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Lavern Wood-Hill
Defendant:
Jack Hinkle and B & C Transport Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hinkle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02020
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Michaela S. Hinkle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hinkle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Treva Hinkle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cody Fillers v. Greeneville, TN Police Department, et al
as 23-5510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CODY LEE FILLERS
Defendant / Appellee:
GREENEVILLE, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT, GREENE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, 3RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Fillers v. Greeneville Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Cody Lee Fillers
Defendant:
Greeneville Police Department, Greene County Sheriff's Department, 3rd Judicial District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinkle v. Thomas et al
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Alex W. Thomas and Zhiirkane James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Newman
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Nick Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Weyand
as 3:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Matt Weyand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Lindsey
as 3:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Demetrius W. Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
