Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Darga v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11976
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Darga
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McIntosh v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Harlan McIntosh
Defendant:
Ingrid Crabtree, John Doe, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03968
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Epps
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Estate of Gustav Sloboda et al
as 1:2022cv01374
Defendant:
Woodville Investments, Ltd., GS Rentals, Ltd., Estate of Gustav Sloboda and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Nuss v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022mc50216
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Nuss
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Menzies v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Menzies
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Cromartie v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2021cv02583
Plaintiff:
Alton Cromartie
Defendant:
Ingrid Jones, Leah Bobb-Itt, Lashaunda Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00505
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
