Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Success #416867 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
Derwin Success #416867
Defendant:
Matthew Macauley, Unknown Ferris, James McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore #223268 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore #223268
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv11957
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Combs v. Bunting et al
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Harold Combs
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Lyon, Polly Schmalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Gary C Mohr, Gary R. Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parrish et al v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P. et al
as 2:2011cv15031
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Parrish and Heidi L. Parrish
Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P. and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden Madison Correctional Institution, Deputy Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Bernstein et al
as 2:2010cv11384
Plaintiff:
John Isaac Harris
Defendant:
Richard Bernstein, Tina Abbott, Eugene Driker and others
USA v. Michael Parrish
as 08-2203
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. PARRISH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
