Cases 1 - 10 of 14
James Ferrell v. Josh Sparkman, et al
as 20-5515
Defendant / Appellee:
NORMA MCGEE OGLE, Military hearing officer, LISA ZAVOGIANNIS, JUSTIN WALLING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Ferrell v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2019cv00067
Defendant:
William M Locke, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00840
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Resortcom International, LLC.
as 1:2019cv01378
Defendant:
Resortcom International, LLC.
Plaintiff:
James Everett Shelton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
SHELTON et al v. DIRECT ENERGY, LP, et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Kaa Energy, Inc. and Direct Energy, LP
Plaintiff:
Jon Frey and James Everett Shelton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Shelton v. LIG International LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01868
Defendant:
Yuri Lima, Carlos Maloff, Danny Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
James Everett Shelton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act/Junk Fax Prevention Act
Dreyer v. Beckton et al
as 1:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
Chris Dreyer
Defendant:
James Everett Beckton and Quest Global, Inc., a/k/a, Quest Global Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dreyer v. Beckton et al
as 1:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
Chris Dreyer
Defendant:
James Everett Beckton and Quest Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooler v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2014dp20126
Plaintiff:
James Everett Cooler
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Gowans v. Cookie Crew
as 12-6134
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES EVERETT GOWANS
Respondent - Appellee:
COOKIE CREWS, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
