Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 496
Bushner v. Kerner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01861
Plaintiff: Raymond D. Bushner
Defendant: Investigator Eric Kerner, Investigator John/Jane Tabor, Captain John/Jane Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Rardin
as 2:2024cv10994
Petitioner: Jessie Andrews
Respondent: Eric Rardin
Woods v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65171
Plaintiff: Jessie A. Woods
Defendant: Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff: Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant: Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02124
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Moore et al v. StonePeak Ceramics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: John Moore and Jessie Woolverton
Defendant: StonePeak Ceramics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Evans et al v. Gordon et al
as 2:2024cv10289
Plaintiff: Andrew Evans and Ryan Geheb
Defendant: Mark Gordon, Bradley Beldo, Christopher Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dotson v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv02053
Petitioner: Jessie Dotson
Respondent: Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitfield v. MaCauley
as 2:2024cv10065
Petitioner: Lenny Jessie Whitefield and Lenny Jessie Whitfield
Respondent: Matt MaCauley
Tennison v. Jessie et al
as 3:2023cv01074
Plaintiff: Timothy Tennison
Defendant: Christopher Jessie and Givens & Houchin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?