Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fridley et al v. Children's Hospital Medical Center et al
as 1:2021cv00425
Defendant:
Foong-Yen Lim, M.D. Timothy Crombleholme, Children's Hospital Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
B.F., a Minor, by and through K.F. and B.F., A.F., a Minor, by and through K.F. and B.F., Keri Fridley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 5:2020cv12726
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
G.W.1, LeeAnne Walters, G.W.2. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
B.F. et al v. Middlebury Academy et al
as 5:2018cv01890
Defendant:
Middlebury Academy, Cambridge Education Group, LLC, St. Aloysius Orphanage and others
Plaintiff:
B.B., K.F. and B.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester et al v. K.H. Sharp et al
as 3:2015cv00730
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
K.H. Sharp, R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rochester v. Loubshire et al
as 3:2015cv00371
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
f/n/u Loubshire, R.B. Harwell and K.F. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. R.B Harwell, et al
as 3:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J.M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
