Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Garrett v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01063
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Andrea L. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garrett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00195
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Garrett et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20116
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Garrett and Jane L. Garrett
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv02391
Plaintiff:
Andrea L. Garrett
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garrett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv01066
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Garrett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Novel, et al., v. State of New York et al
as 2:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Sur G Novel, Anna Craig, Jerimy Mulligan and others
Defendant:
State of New York, Committee on Professional Standards, Jevon L. Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Headden et al v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Headden , Doug Stone , Robert Evans and others
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , Ron Littlefield , Chattanooga Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
