Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lilley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02500
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lilley-Coles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01371
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lottie Lilley-Coles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris Weatherspoon v. Surjit Dinsa, et al
as 20-1088
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN KLINE, Primary Therapist, JOHN KORNOWSKI, Psychologist, UNKNOWN SPIRKO, Primary Therapist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Lilley v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv02177
Petitioner:
Michael Lilley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gun Owners of America, Inc. et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2018cv01429
Plaintiff:
Tim Harmsen, Rachel Malone, Jacob Lilley and others
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Gun Owners of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Weatherspoon v. Dinsa et al
as 2:2017cv11196
Plaintiff:
Morris Weatherspoon
Defendant:
Surjit Dinsa, John Kornowski, Amberly McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
USA v. Michael Lilley
as 15-6415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LILLEY
Morris Weatherspoon v. Surjit Dinsa, et al
as 15-2389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
SURJIT DINSA, Psychiatrist, JOHN KORNOWSKI, Phychologist, MCGUIRE, Nurse and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
