Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lollis et al v. Cenovus Energy Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Levi Lollis Jr., David Cook and Rolando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Cenovus Energy Inc., John Does and Lima Refining Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alan Lollis v. Ronald Erdo
as 16-3923
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN C. LOLLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden
Haney v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lollie Mae Haney
Defendant:
Josh Rhodes and Joe Guy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lollis v. Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary
as 5:2015cv00703
Petitioner:
Alan C. Lollis
Respondent:
Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brenda Bell, et al v. Ernest Moniz, et al
as 15-5304
Plaintiff:
FRAN ANSLEY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA BELL, CAROLINE BEST, BETTY COLEMAN and others
Defendant:
STEVEN C. ERHART, LARRY KELLEY, CHARLES G. SPENCER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNEST MONIZ, Ernest Moniz, Ph.D., Secretary of Energy in his official capacity
Ansley et al v. Erhart et al
as 3:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bell , Caroline Best , Betty Coleman and others
Defendant:
Steven C Erhart , Larry Kelley , Charles G. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lolli v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22141
Plaintiff:
Mark Lolli
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lollis v. CCA Silverdale et al
as 1:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Kentrail Lollis
Defendant:
CCA Silverdale and Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis v. Hamilton County Jail et al
as 1:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
Kentrail Lollis
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail and Lt Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lolli v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
Mark Lolli
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
