Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rayford, Jr v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Rayford, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Charles S. Bloodworth, Jaclyn M. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bates v. Allergan Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00521
Defendant:
Allergan Inc., McGhan Medical Corporation, Inamed Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Bates et al v. Dewine et al
as 1:2016cv00975
Petitioner:
Clayton M. Bates, Rachel N. Parks, Beverly Croy and others
Respondent:
Richard M. Dewine, Anneka P. Collins, Donnie Barrerra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allstate Insurance Company v. Shull et al
as 1:2014cv01244
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Robert Shull, Jr., Wanda R. Pugh, James K. Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v Elgin Olmsted, LLC
as 1:2011cv00583
Plaintiff:
Renee M. Bates
Defendant:
Elgin Olmsted, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bates et al v. The Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2009cv02144
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Bates, Diane M. Bates, Retha Jones and others
Defendant:
The Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Company and Procter and Gamble Distributing Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
