Cases 1 - 10 of 326
Moses v. Sexton et al
as 1:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
James Moses
Defendant:
CoreCivic Medical Staff, Manager Futrell, Warden Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Central State University et al
as 2:2024cv03130
Defendant:
Morakinyo Kuti, Central State University Board of Trustees, Pamela Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Moses, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zerella v. Hathaway Court et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Defendant:
Stephanie Medows, Hathaway Court, Joe Glitz and others
Plaintiff:
Carmine Zerella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Simmons v. Genesee, County of et al
as 4:2024cv10815
Defendant:
YesCare Corp, CHS TX, Inc, Genesee, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Kristen Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moses v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Eli Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pamela Moses v. TN, et al
as 24-5195
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MOSES
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STEVEN JOHN MULROY, in his individual and official capacity as the District Attorney General and AMY P. WEIRICH, in her individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
White v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10550
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, MDOC, Smith and others
Pamela Moses v. TN, et al
as 24-5086
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MOSES
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, AMY P. WEIRICH, in her individual capacity and STEVEN JOHN MULROY
Moses et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moses and Denise Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
