Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Heath v. Cole et al
as 1:2024cv10568
Plaintiff: Mark Andrew Heath and Mark Andrew Heath [E-filer]
Defendant: Gary Charles Cole, Jr., Adrian Anderson and Oscoda, County of
Taylor et al. v. Ryder Transportation Solutions, LLC et al.
as 3:2023cv02049
Plaintiff: Mark Andrew Taylor, Lisa Ann Taylor, Josephine Ella Rose Taylor and others
Defendant: Ryder Transportation Solutions, LLC, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mark Morris v. USA
as 20-5536
Petitioner / Appellant: MARK ANDREW MORRIS
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Andrews v. Werner Co (DE) et al
as 2:2020cv10420
Plaintiff: Mark Andrews
Defendant: Werner Co (DE) and The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10171
Plaintiff: Verlesa Berry, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant: Bradley Wurfel, Michael Glasgow, Michael Prysby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. USA
as 5:2018cv00027
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Mark Andrew Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parrish #219258 v. Campbell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01146
Petitioner: Mark Andrew Parrish #219258
Respondent: Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Mark Morri
as 16-6396
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MARK ANDREW MORRIS
In re: Michael Andrew Chuparkoff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016mc00051
Respondent: Mark Andrew Chuparkoff
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
John Andrews, et al v. James Flaiz, et al
as 14-4288
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN MARK ANDREWS and JUDEE ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES R. FLAIZ, DAVID JOYCE, NICHOLAS BURLING and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?