Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Webb v. Jenkins
as 1:2016cv00266
Petitioner:
Michael D Webb
Respondent:
Charlotte Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kimberly Eversole,, et al v. Campbell County, Kentucky, et al
as 13-6502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY EVERSOLE, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Wayne Webb, MARTHA CAMACHO, JOHN C. CHAMBERS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY, CAMPBELL COUNTY FISCAL COURT, GREG BUCKLER, Individually and others
USA v. Michael Webb
as 08-5519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL CLARENCE WEBB
Webb v. Mitchell
as 06-4606
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. WEBB
Respondent - Appellee:
BETTY MITCHELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
