Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Hill v. USA
as 3:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Michael King
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLEN KING
Kitchen v. Lucasville Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Kitchen
Defendant:
Lucasville Correctional Institution, Officer A. Corns, Officer J. Romine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Depew v. Stolarsky et al
as 1:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Depew
Defendant:
Lon Stolarsky, City of Solon, James Cervik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kato v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02774
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Kato
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGehee v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02716
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen McGehee
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. $17,790.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2021cv02250
Claimant:
Jeffrey Michael Allen and Sergio E. Rodriguez
Defendant:
$18,057.00 in United States Currency and $17,790.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Peck et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05324
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Peck and Debra Kay Peck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Baker
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff, Monroe County, TN and Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
