Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Henry v. Burgess
as 2:2022cv11159
Petitioner: Joseph Michael Henry
Respondent: Michael Burgess
Towe et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00593
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HENRY TOWE and SHEILA ANN TOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. Herman Losely and Son, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00887
Plaintiff: Michael Henry
Defendant: Herman Losely and Son, Inc. , Karl Losely and Edward Losely
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00684
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Parker v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv00144
Plaintiff: Michael Henry Cooly Parker
Defendant: Retiree Resources Corporation and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Peterson v. Jeffrey Wood
as 16-2154
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL HENRY PETERSON
Respondent - Appellee: JEFFREY J. WOOD
Peterson #773661 v. Woods et al
as 2:2015cv00021
Petitioner: Michael Henry Peterson #773661
Respondent: Jeffrey Woods and Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry v. Mary Glynn Residential Services
as 1:2013cv01534
Plaintiff: Michael Henry
Defendant: Mary Glynn Residential Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Giles v. Heaton et al
as 2:2010cv00959
Plaintiff: Joshua Giles
Defendant: Gerald Heaton, Kim Kellogg-Martin, Michael Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michael Sneed v. Tennessee State Supreme Court, et al
as 09-5774
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL HENRY SNEED
Defendant - Appellee: TENNESSEE STATE SUPREME COURT, CORNELIA CLARK, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court for the State of Tennessee, in her official capacity, MICHAEL CATALANO, Clerk for the Tennessee State Supreme Court, in his official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?