Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Ford Motor Company (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Bailey, Mary Mcknatt, Lana Rymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Drinnon v. Claiborne County et al
as 2:2020cv00029
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jeffrey Drinnon
Defendant:
Deputy Jacob Crawford, Deputy Brian Isbell, Deputy Carl Mozingo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilton v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00133
Plaintiff:
Sharla Wilton
Defendant:
State of Ohio and United States of America
Petitioner:
Rebecca S. Pierson, Robin Rae Kelly, Jacqueline A. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Claiborne County et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00207
Defendant:
Claiborne County , David Ray , Jason Henegar and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Mozingo et al
as 2:2011cv02887
Plaintiff:
Brien J. Charles
Defendant:
K. Leslie Mozingo, Office of the Public Defenders, Office of Attorney General (30th) Judicial District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv15348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
