Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peavy v. Hospital Authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
as 3:2015cv01043
Plaintiff:
DeAnna Peavy
Defendant:
Hospital Authority of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 36695 CLARITA, LIVONIA, MICHIGAN 48152 et al
as 2:2015cv12679
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 36695 CLARITA, LIVONIA, MICHIGAN 48152, REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17225 LENNANE, REDFORD, MICHIGAN, 48240, REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9977 HILLCREST, LIVONIA, MICHIGAN, 48150 and others
Claimant:
William Elias , Vicky Elias , Michigan Property Ventures, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alston-Jones v. Pridgen et al
as 1:2012mc00025
Plaintiff:
Anna-Maria Alston-Jones
Defendant:
John C. Pridgen, Robert Chasteen, T. Christopher Hughes and others
Peavy et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2012dp20882
Plaintiff:
Debra Peavy and Bryon Peavy
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavie v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00014
Petitioner:
Robert Peavie
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Edwin Peavy
as 11-4240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWIN PEAVY
USA v. Edwin Peavy
as 11-4236
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWIN PEAVY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
