Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Tyrosh Brown v. City of Grand Rapids, MI, et al
as 22-2115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYROSH BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE HABA, ERIC JORDON, COREY SLAGER and others
Brown v. Grand Rapids, City of et al
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Tyrosh Brown
Defendant:
Grand Rapids, City of, Joe Haba, Eric Jordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Prindle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04052
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PRINDLE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prindle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02672
Plaintiff:
David Prindle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warner v. Greene County Jail Staff et al
as 1:2019cv00203
Defendant:
Captain Eric Prindle, Sgt Reichley, Sgt. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Lopez Hernandez v. Ed Prindle, et al
as 15-5390
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO LOPEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ED PRINDLE, Jailer, Boone County Jail, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, SYLVIA BONACCORSI-MANO, Chicago Assistant Field Office Director Detention and Removal Operations and others
Lopez-Hernandez v. Prindle et al
as 2:2015cv00010
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Lopez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Ed Prindle, Eric Holder, Sylvia Bonaccorsi-Mano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lowe v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 2:2014cv00178
Petitioner:
Kurt J. Lowe
Respondent:
Edward Prindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lowe v. Kentucky Court of Justice et al
as 2:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kurt J. Lowe
Defendant:
Kentucky Court of Justice, Department of Public Advocacy, Boone County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowe v. Prindle et al
as 2:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Kurt J. Lowe
Defendant:
Edward Prindle, Boone County Jail and Kentucky D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
