Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Raymond Smith v. Gary Miniard
as 22-1259
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYMOND SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: GARY MINIARD, Warden
Poffenbarger v. Kendall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff: Michael Poffenbarger
Defendant: Frank Kendall, Robert Miller, Richard Scobee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Smith v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv05565
Plaintiff: Raymond Smith
Defendant: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond SmithIn re: Raymond Smith
as 21-2905
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND SMITH
Respondent: GARY MINIARD
Smith #142661 v. Miniard
as 1:2021cv00702
Petitioner: Raymond Smith #142661
Respondent: Gary Miniard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: General Motors LLC CP4 Fuel Pump Litigation
as 2:2020cv10109
Plaintiff: John Thomas White, Richard Samson, Stacy Wade Sizelove and others
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith #153086 v. Heyns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00016
Plaintiff: Raymond Smith #153086
Defendant: Daniel Heyns, Jeffrey Woods, Thomas Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Raymond Smith
as 10-1927
Movant: In re: RAYMOND SMITH
McPhee v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2009cv10052
Plaintiff: Amy McPhee and Amy McPhee
Defendant: Detroit, City of, Vicki Yost, Charles Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karim Koubriti v. Richard Convertino Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1016
Plaintiff - Appellee: KARIM KOUBRITI
Defendant - Appellant: RICHARD CONVERTINO
Defendant: MICHAEL THOMAS and HARRY RAYMOND SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?