Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Reaves v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Michael Reaves
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reaves v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv11633
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Respondent:
Warden Catherine S. Bauman
Petitioner:
Turon Jerome Reaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Reaves v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02619
Plaintiff:
Casey Reaves
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reaves v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02010
Plaintiff:
Michael Reaves
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reaves v. CWS Powder Coatings Company, L.P.
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Shelly Reaves
Defendant:
CWS Powder Coatings Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Perry et al
as 1:2021cv00067
Plaintiff:
Randy Williams
Defendant:
Grady Perry, (f/n/u) Carter, (f/n/u) Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Josten's, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Josten's, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barry Reaves
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Tiger Sports Properties, LLC
as 2:2019cv02495
Defendant:
Tiger Sports Properties, LLC
Plaintiff:
Reaves Law Firm, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Wellness Solutions Geriatrics, PLLC et al
as 3:2019cv00594
Plaintiff:
Veliska Thomas, Megan Parton, Chered Pearson and others
Defendant:
John W. Cain, II, Steven L. Scesa, Golden Griffon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
