Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nichols v. Spalding et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Nichols
Defendant:
Samuel Todd Spalding, Rhonda Thomas and Kim May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Ronald Nichols
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
L.A., et. al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv12050
Defendant:
United States of America, W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Charles Edward Rollison, DO and others
Plaintiff:
L. A., Kiersten Reeser and Jeremy Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
A et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv11317
Defendant:
W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Alma Garlo, MD, Monica Hill, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Armstrong, Kiersten Reeser and L A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Deangelo Anthony v. Kenneth Salisbury, et al
as 19-2073
Defendant / Appellee:
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, Private Michigan Corporation, KENNETH SALISBURY, Inspector / ARUS, ANGELA HOLMAN, Qualified Mental Health Professional and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANGELO ANTHONY
Laury v. Jevirell et al
as 2:2015cv13365
Plaintiff:
Darrin Laury
Defendant:
Mechelle Jevirell, John Battles, Robert Weiss and others
Annabel v. Eaton et al
as 4:2014cv11429
Plaintiff:
Robert Annabel
Defendant:
J Eaton, S Campbell, Christine Hemry and others
Bradley Watson v. City of Marysville Ohio, et al
as 12-3478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MARYSVILLE OHIO, FLOYD GOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER DIEHL and others
David Nichols v. John Motley
as 10-6406
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RONALD NICHOLS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MOTLEY, Warden
Perez v. Ross County Commissioners et al
as 2:2010cv00714
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Perez
Defendant:
Ross County Commissioners , Ronald Nichols , Glenn Detty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
